Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaserWash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Dover Corporation. Daniel (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

LaserWash

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of any notability for this brand name and product. Sources provided include the company's own web site and patent applications in the US and Ausraia. WP:BEFORE searches yields many promo sites, many with near identical copy "...has less moving parts..."(sic) but nothing independent and reliable that discusses the product. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 09:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Transportation,  and United States of America.  Velella  Velella Talk  09:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Wisconsin.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak Keep: Found a couple of secondary sources, not sure about reliability:, . The article as it currently exists is not very good, with primary and/or promotional sources only.  Needs work. If the sources I provided are not reliable, then I would be fine with a delete. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge (highly selective) into Dover Corporation. The brand and the company can be mentioned in one sentence at Dover. It is owned by subsidiary OPW. Please also copy usable refs. gidonb (talk) 11:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Velella and User:WeirdNAnnoyed: can you both live with this solution? gidonb (talk) 16:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * That works for me. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would address the current issue. Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you both!!! User:Liz, you relisted this twice. Can you close it? gidonb (talk) 22:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.