Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Christmas (Ashley Tisdale song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Proto :: ►  16:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Last Christmas (Ashley Tisdale song)

 * — (View AfD)

As a holiday single, it is not a "true" single (because it is essentially time-limited. As it is a non-notable "plain" cover, I feel the information can easily be merged onto the Last Christmas article, especially since there is very little info on the single.  As far as I can tell, it is simply an iTunes release, and although a user recently put "Current Single" on the page, I see that there is already a followup single.  I prod'd the page, and it was removed after the 5 days (well, on the 5th day), so...yeah.  I propose a merge deletion.   Last Christmas mentions the cover, and that's enough.  It's not really a notable release.  SKS2K6 20:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment:I went to the next single's page, and it is listed as the singer's first single. So as far as I can tell, this song is simply a holiday release, not a legitimate single. SKS2K6 20:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Article merger does not involve deletion at any stage. Please only nominate articles for deletion where an administrator hitting a delete button is actually part of the process that you want. Uncle G 21:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Well, it would actually be deleting, because there is very little info to merge. All there is "Ashley Tisdale has released a cover of Last Christmas, officially released on iTunes in December of 2006", if that.  Last Christmas already mentions that she did a cover.  Isn't that all the info that's needed for a non-notable semi-single? SKS2K6 21:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete There is no reason why this requires its own article. The notation that she covered it at Last Christmas is about all that needs to be said, thus, no reason to merge. Resolute 00:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete That she is mentioned in a list of people who covered the song is enough mention, since there doesn't appear to be much to say about this version. —ShadowHalo 06:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Information already housed at Last Christmas. Perhaps this can be a redirect to that page, but article is unnecessary. GassyGuy 06:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.