Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Dragon (Sisqó album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Last Dragon (Sisqó album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:CRYSTAL Spartaz Humbug! 03:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 14:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NALBUMS states: "In a few special cases, an unreleased album may qualify for an article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it—for example, Guns 'n Roses' 2008 album Chinese Democracy had an article as early as 2004. However, this only applies to a very small number of exceptionally high-profile projects — generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label." The comparatively fewer bits of apparent available information for this album suggests it does not meet the above standard.  Gongshow  Talk 20:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Gongshow. Virtually everything is unsourced or original research anyways. (For instance, is it really a "dragon trilogy", or does he just name his albums with the word "dragon" in them? Are those tracks really confirmed? Was it delayed for "no reason"? Virtually nothing of real substance... Sergecross73   msg me   23:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.