Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Question Unanswered


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Last Question Unanswered

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Book doesn't appear to be notable enough for an article. Everything in the article except the lead is a mess, and the lead isn't particularly great. J♯m (talk &#124; contribs) 19:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet WP:GNG. Each of the references is directory entry of some sort; none of them demonstrate the book's notability. ubiquity (talk) 19:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 05:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 05:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment and 'delete, there may be some conflict of interest issues here, the creator of this article appears to be an employee of a company associated with the book's author, which may not necessarily be a problem if this book was notable but it does not meet WP:NBOOK, having garnered no reliable reviews. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm not finding anything using the India newspaper search engine. I'd snow close this since I don't think that this will end differently, but I would like to see if there are foreign language sources available. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.