Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last of the Grads


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Last of the Grads

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I initially requested WP:G5 deletion but realised that there have been edits by other users (good-faith editors) other than the creator. I'm still not completely satisfied that this film is notable. There is only one reference and while it is a decent one, I could not find anything else while searching. Everything else coming up just seems to be either self-published or just a rehashing of the Decider article. My understanding of WP:GNG and WP:NFILM is that there should be more than one decent source to justify an article. This might be WP:TOOSOON as maybe there will be clear notability after the film is actually released. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Move: Yeah, while there isn't much notability now, there may be some in the future. I would recommend moving this article into a draft until enough notability has been found. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 23:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The Decider article is pretty sparse with only three sentences describing the plot, and one of those sentences is a summary of the other two which are both a direct quote from the movie's website. In fact, there is little to nothing in the source that is original content, and I would not consider a simple restating of the film's basic details substantial enough for WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, especially as the sole source (and I too failed to find better). This is WP:TOOSOON and we shouldn't assume the film will be notable in the future per WP:CRYSTAL.  Pais  a re pa  00:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * While I agree with you on not assuming future notability, I say we move this article into a draft, and if not enough notability can be found within a certain period of time, I say we delete the draft and call it. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The film just doesn't meet WP:NFF. Articles can sit in the draftspace waiting for notability to be established, but not waiting for notability to be gained.  Pais  a re pa  22:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - could have been speedied since the creator is a sock of .  Onel 5969  TT me 17:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails NFF/GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 23:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep? - Maybe instead of deleting this article completely, I say we move the current contents of this article into a draft and turn this article into a redirect to Cr1TiKaL because his role is the reason why so many people know about this film. But like I said, if not enough notability can be established within a certain period of time, I say we delete the draft and call it. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * We don't keep articles on the off-chance that they might meet criteria if and when the film is released. See WP:CRYSTAL Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is the case, then I say just make this article a redirect to Cr1TiKaL. Also, I said move it to a draft, not keep the actual article. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "Delete and redirect" might be the best solution. I would ideally prefer this to just a normal redirect so that the long-term vandals edits are removed. I would have no issue with a good faith editor, that isn't blocked, creating an article in draft and following WP:AfC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closing admin - as per conversation above, I would have no issue with this closing as 'delete and redirect to Cr1TiKaL' if preferred. I'm not sure if this is the done thing with non-notable films or whether outright deletion is preferred. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Now that we have a solution, I have copied all of the contents of this article into a draft. I am still waiting for permission to change every content of this article into the redirect to Cr1TiKaL. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 17:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.