Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lastman's Bad Boy Furniture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:55, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Lastman's Bad Boy Furniture

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't think this promotional article shows notability. the advertisements in question are the uttermost trivia.  DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Slurmulon (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC) Sorry for all the likely errors here - I have never commented on a wikipedia process before - I feel like I have to be a developer to do so.
 * The article seems notable in that it has a strong attachment to Mel Lastman, a prominent political figure in Toronto, Canada.

Would it serve disambiguation to have this article collapsed with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Lastman - or is it better to have this item separated, as it involves other players and commercial interests? Some of the language is verging on puffery and could be made more neutral. Noteworthiness: The Mel Lastman article is cited in a way that shows inter/national media coverage of this entity. thse citations should be used here, as opposed to a metro Toronto newspaper, which seems provincial.
 * Disclosure - I am currently working with this company, and came upon this Afd via Twitter while researching online marketing.


 * Delete. Non-notable and SPAMish. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:30, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Can't find any RS. The Toronto SUN link in the article is dead and the other one is Lasman's blog.-- Stv  Fett erly  (Edits)  16:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: No significant coverage. Even if the Toronto Sun link worked, it likely would not show notability because it would be local news. SL93 (talk) 21:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.