Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Late 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Late 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of temperature records. No WP:LASTING effects: people turned up the air conditioning, increasing electricity demand, and an old sheep died. Yawn. The real heat wave in that region happened a few months earlier: Early 2009 southeastern Australia heat wave. The late 2009 temperatures do not deserve a separate article. — JFG talk 20:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 01:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 01:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 01:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: insicriminate & does not meet WP:NEVENT. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:17, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't pass the general criteria for being a severe heatwave as opposed to standard non-notable ones that still break records occasionally and kill the ill and elderly. Looks like a pretty standard heatwave. Kingofaces43 (talk) 20:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete — I would argue that the sheep is more notable than the weather! The inpact was pretty standard; none of what was reported had lasting significance. There is a distinct lack of sources outside routine weather reports so—unless this is revisited by academics in the future—as of now this is what Wikpedia is not.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:44, 31 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.