Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Late night shopping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Shopping hours.  Sandstein  06:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Late night shopping

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unless somebody does something drastic, this article will sit here and ferment in its uselessness. It basically says "Late night shopping is shopping that happens late at night." I'm pretty sure my dog knows that. Jamesx12345 (talk) 23:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Completed incomplete nom. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Restore redirect to Late Night Shopping This however, can go as pretty much a dicdef (and no, 9pm is not late night except to stereotypical Wheel of Fortune fans).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge into shopping hours which is a broader treatment of the topic with considerable notability. Warden (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete topic is too trivial for an encyclopedia article. Kitfoxxe (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * BTW Shopping hours is concerned with laws and customs of various countries, not the act of shopping itself. A more logical redirect would be to Shopping, which is a good article. One sentence could be added: "You can do it late at night." Kitfoxxe (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Restore redirect per Nate. Ansh666 20:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect per WP:SNOW and WP:CHEAP. There is less than no harm in a simple re-do of a common-sense, old redirect. Bearian (talk) 19:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.