Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latency Optimizer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  13:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Latency Optimizer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advert-like article that is not supported by any clear reliable sources; currently most if not all the sources cited in the article are download links and forum posts, which obviously fail to meet WP:RS. Upon further inspection, of all the sources, only one source seems to at least scrap past the WP:RS requirements, and that is the Softpedia review. YuMaNuMa Contrib 10:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. More spam from Voidz. Sourcing is a mix of primary, pr and download sites. no coverage from independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 20:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.