Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LatexFashionTV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

LatexFashionTV

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence for notability. In my opinion not even an indication of significance, but A7 speedy was removed.  DGG ( talk ) 03:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 14:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC) Delete there does not seem to be much interest in this subject on wikipedia or the media, lack of mainstream coverage means WP:GNG is not passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still nothing at all convincing for the needed independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  00:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.