Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laticrete International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Laticrete International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. No assertion of notability. Non-notable company. Existence is not notability. Promotional ad copy. Wtshymanski (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Just another run of the WP:MILL company. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem to have any references to notable news, events or actions. Most content was added under the original page creation edit back in 2009 Randomeditor1000 (talk) 18:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Promotional in tone, and no significant coverage from third-party sources. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: The constant use of all caps for the company's name makes the promotional tone glaringly-obvious. Alexius08 (talk) 06:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete SNOW. I don't think anything else can be said, or anything can be said to keep this. South Nashua (talk) 02:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.