Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latigent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Latigent
del nonnotable. For (quoting) "one of the world's leading providers of business intelligence" only 143 unique google hits. mikka (t) 00:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:VSCA. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag_of_Texas.svg|30px]] 00:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ditto WP:VSCA. Death Eater Dan    [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] ( Muahaha ) 00:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant spamvertising. -- Kinu t /c  00:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not even sure they're Chicago's leading BI provider. Looks like a small Cognos consulting group.  NN per nom.  Kuru   talk  00:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as one of Wikipedia's leading providers of BS. --Aaron 01:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. savidan(talk) (e@) 01:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - You think even Yellowikis would want this? Cyde Weys  04:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. -- Samir ∙ TC [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|  ]] 07:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CORP violation; non-notable company.  (aeropagitica)   07:12, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. CrypticBacon 08:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:CORP advertising.-- Dakota ~   °  22:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam. Metamagician3000 06:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete spam. Nigelthefish 14:41, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the Proposed deletion process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 02:44, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.