Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latimer (PAT station)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 23:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Latimer (PAT station)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This single station probably isn't needful of it's own article, unless there happens to be something unusual about it. Irbisgreif (talk) 02:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep- there are dozens of other articles on other stations in the PAT network. Those made it through, and with some tweaks, this should too. Airplaneman  talk 02:58, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Those other stations should be considered for deletion as well then. Wikipedia shouldn't be a directory of stations. Unless there's something notable about the station, why should it get an encyclopaedia article? Irbisgreif (talk) 03:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep.: Every station on the Washington D.C. Metro and New York Subway have a page. Transit stations are remarkable in that they represent a large capital expense to the metropolitan government, and represent the arteries of most major cities. Many districts in major cities are named after the transit stations that serve that area. These stations are as central to the cities that contain them as their notable buildings. Perhaps this could be another wiki project of public transportation. 74.237.158.41 (talk) 03:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per 74.237.158.41. Consensus is that individual stations on urban rail transport routes are notable. Thryduulf (talk) 10:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:TWP established consensus that railway stations are notable. Mjroots (talk) 07:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per all except nom. Consensus has long established that rail stations are notable.--Oakshade (talk) 08:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep articles on stations. Content worthy of an online encyclopedia. Fg2 (talk) 14:36, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep articles on stations, although some of these are just a street stop. Scillystuff (talk) 23:31, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.