Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latin mnemonics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep - obviously transformed since nom, slam-dunk keeper.--Docg 16:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Latin mnemonics

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A list of mnemonics for remembering Latin is not encyclopedic. Prod declined. Mangostar (talk) 13:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a list of mnemonics. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, Wikipedia is not a list of mnemonics. -- Simple  Paradox   17:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - what I see instead is a well referenced article about the bits of subliterary verse and oral lore that once were a major part of most educated Europeans' and American's upbringing, and as such continue to resonate in literature and song. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, article has been heavily expanded since nom with substantial sourcing. It still doesn't have much structure as an article but that's an editing issue. --Dhartung | Talk 21:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. I looked, and I still didn't find the part of WP:NOT that says "Wikipedia is not a list of mnemonics".  Where exactly is that located?  Mandsford (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I have no idea what state this was in when the AFD was initiated, but as of now, this is NOT merely a list of mnemonics, it is an article about a concept that clearly exists outside of wikipedia. Well researched and well referenced, I see no reason for this article to be deleted.  --Jayron32| talk | contribs  17:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jayron. Transformed since nom. Johnbod (talk) 14:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.