Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latin nouns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect Latin nouns to Latin declension, and redirect the verb articles to Latin conjugation, since the history hasn't been recorded on the transwikied articles yet. --Core desat  23:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Latin nouns

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page is being nominated as for deletion to be considered per Wikipedia is not a dictionary I found it while working a clean up poject, I have no opinion, It appears to have been transwikied to Wiktionary. Of note check Latin irregular verbs - deletion logand consider if Latin verbs (A to K) and Latin verbs (L to Z) should be considered with with it. I leave it to the community to decide Jeepday 00:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is definitely inappropriate for wikipedia. It is appropriate for a Latin textbook. - Richardcavell 01:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 *  Delete all three Redirect - Latin nouns, Latin verbs (A to K) and Latin verbs (L to Z) have all already been moved to Wiktionary where they belong. We don't need them here any longer. Jimp 01:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC) - The solution given by JulesH below seems better than deletion.  One might search for Latin nouns (or Latin noun) Latin declension would be a good place to be redirected. Jimp 00:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly falls under Wikipedia is not a dictionary in any language. SkierRMH 07:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WINAD. Mkdw talk 08:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WINAD; no need for a transwiki. Sr13 (T|C) 08:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Latin declension which discusses grammatical aspects of the treatment of nouns in Latin. JulesH 12:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Latin declension; JulesH beat me to it. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Very long definition, I see no WP:NOT per WP:NN.Regards - Telly  addict  16:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Don't know, what it is. Al-Bargit 19:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.