Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latino Fan Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Mackensen (talk) 23:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Latino Fan Club

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources. A google news archive search for "Latino Fan Club" comes up with no relevant results. See Reliable sources and Verifiability for relevant policies. Chick Bowen 01:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of sexuality and gender-related deletions.   —Becksguy 19:20, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, likely porn-spam. Realkyhick 02:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's not spam, although it is porn. LFC is a significant and long time producer of ethnic gay porn located in NYC. Market is for those who want Latin men, thugs, newyorkricans, etc. There are about 35 videos listed on their website for sale. Review here which mentions it, although in embarrassingly little detail. Here's another article from GayYN. Two of their videos were nominated (didn't win) for a 2007 GayVN award.  Here's an entry from Fleshbot.  Google lists 87,900 hits, most listing Videos/DVDs for sale, granted.  Fotofactory Press is publishing an erotic art book this fall featuring their models, here. This listing shows that a LFC video has reached #2 position in weekly rentals. The article has almost no references, and much appears to be original research, but thats reason to improve, not delete.  — Becksguy 09:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Er, correct me if I'm wrong of course, but none of those look like reliable sources to me. Chick Bowen 00:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Taken individually I would agree with you that's it's not enough. It's all I could find, as I was really really tired. I don't like this stuff, but the company is notable within it's niche market. And I think we are generally too quick to delete when improvement would be a better option.  I think the company is notable, any thing else can be fixed. — Becksguy 01:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Per WP:PORNBIO, a nomination for GayVN establishes notability, LFC had two of their videos nominated in 2007 for the  Best Ethnic category, so that should be sufficient. — Becksguy 16:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete porn spam. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PORNBIO. Please note that the article does need to be improved.  &mdash; madman bum and angel 15:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Since this is a company, I think it should technically be judged under WP:CORP rather than WP:PORNBIO. On the subject of sources, the company is briefly/trivially mentioned in this book and there is apparently at least one Village Voice article dedicated to the company (see ). Black Falcon (Talk) 22:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.