Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latitude Learning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:33, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Latitude Learning

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

trvial awards, no substantial references that aren't PR, promotional article  DGG ( talk ) 08:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails Wp:GNG.  Lots of "sources" but not a single one qualifies as a reliable independent secondary source.  Msnicki (talk) 11:52, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Every source listed in the article is either primary or dubiously reliable, and I could find nothing of substance outside of those. Whether intentional or not, this article right now fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines and functions solely as an advertisement. Comment: The fact that the word "solution" used in the context of thinly veiled marketing is Wiki-linked to the article "Solution" is hilarious to me.  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  21:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.