Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latoya Satnarine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Big Brother Celebrity Hijack. Wizardman 18:02, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Latoya Satnarine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Simply not notable as per WP:BIO. Hasn't actually won an award, and being a backing dancer alone is not enough. I would suggest a merge with Big Brother Celebrity Hijack, but all the information that can be verified is already there, so I'm nominating for deletion. BlinkingBlimey (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no independent secondary sources and fails to separately meet WP:BIO. The Mariah Carey claim is unsourced and fails WP:V. BlueValour (talk) 23:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Big Brother: Celebrity Hijack. There is nothing to merge, but since the material is in the article, why not redirect if somebody looks her up on wikipedia? -- Whpq (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If the article is deleted because she's non-notable, isn't it unlikely anyone will look her up on Wikipedia? BlinkingBlimey (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * With over 6 billion people in the world, how is it unlikely? The Transhumanist (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Big Brother: Celebrity Hijack, per Whpq. It makes sense that if she's covered on Wikipedia her name should lead to that coverage.  Note that notability is not a requirement for redirects, and it is common practice to redirect terms that are not notable enough for their own articles.  See Template messages/Redirect pages for several templates used for redirecting non-notable terms.  The guideline on redirects cites that page as the source of reasons to redirect.  The Transhumanist  17:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above - insignificant coverage in reliable sources Addhoc (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.