Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latvia–Malta relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:02, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Latvia–Malta relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident embassies. Google news search shows up only Eurovision and sporting relations. LibStar (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the usual reasons. JJL (talk) 00:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin, editor has the exact same comment in 6 other AfDs. Ikip (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations task force deletions. – Ikip (talk) 05:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to satisfy notability guideline, and Wikipedia is not a directory. It is more encyclopedic to have 203 sections or even articles about "Foreign relations of..." than 20,000 or so such stubs. Edison (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of third-party sources indicating notability. - Biruitorul Talk 06:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability. And ask that personal attack on an editor be redacted in all the places it appears now.  Collect (talk) 11:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Both countries are EU members, and whilst that would normally lead to there being something substantial to say about the countries' relations, it doesn't seem to be so in this case. Stifle (talk) 13:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks all indications of notability. No assertion of notability, no verifiable sources, no references, ergo, not notable. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  16:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no factors apply to show notability. Bearian (talk) 20:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per what everyone said. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 12:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, the first of many comprimise merges. Eventually these articles will be merged into the "diplomacy of..." articles. PLEASE HELP US Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. So much energy has been wasted in these arguments, which could be used on merging these stub articles onto one page. I strongly encourage the nominator to withdraw the AFD nomination. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this unsourced stub on a relationship for which i can find no reliable sources that would begin to provide the information needed to begin approaching a key guideline for inclusion, notability.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.