Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latvia–Serbia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. --- Balloonman  NO! I'm Spartacus! 00:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Latvia–Serbia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

now that the standstill is over this nomination is valid. neither country has a resident ambassador. only 1 minor bilateral agreement in place of double taxation. . lack of coverage of actual bilateral relations. . LibStar (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This pairing ignores the fact that their relationship is pedestrian and mundance, not notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above - no sources actually discuss this relationship as such, and neither should we. - Biruitorul Talk 06:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources discuss these relations. Fails WP:GNG. Johnuniq (talk) 10:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  —Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.