Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laugh Real Loud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  20:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Laugh Real Loud

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The expression appears to be a neologism that is non-notable. Prod was declined by main editor. JD554 (talk) 13:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete
 * Not notable enough, certainly not on Wikipedia. It might qualify to be mentioned on Wiktionary, though. StaticGull Talk  13:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEO Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: How long will the page take to be deleted, please allow me a little longer to fix the page, i am new at this and will grasp how to do it soon :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattmcfadyen (talk • contribs) 13:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * As per WP:AFD the discussion will last for 5 days before the consensus opinion is acted upon. To show the article needs to remain you will need to add reliable sources which will verify the notability of the article. --JD554 (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Just one of those stupid text symbols that shouldn't belong on Wikipedia. -- Vh o scythe  '''chatter 13:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Neologism, article has no references and is written pretty much entirely by the creator of the little icon that's the core of the page.  Brilliant Pebble (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - also, this is SPAM and COI - the article author is "the popular Emoticon author Matt McFadyen", pushing his own creation. JohnCD (talk) 18:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not as notable as the popular emoticon author Candy-Panda's creation LMAOROFLWAFFLECOPTERPMSLWTFOMGBBQFTW. --Candy-Panda (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.