Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura's List: Books for Women


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 01:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Laura's List: Books for Women
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural AfD as DGG and I see different sides of this and I respect his opinion. I declined an A7 since I thought it asserted notability. He tagged for spam but self-reverted when he saw I'd declined it. I don't find it to be overly spam but am willing to bring it here for discussion and consensus. Honestly, I'm not sure it passes WP:ORG as the attention it garners may only be local. However if there are enough sources, it could probably be salvaged, so I don't think it's hopeless. As it's 1:30 AM and I don't have the time or level of wakefulness to investigate, I'm neutral at this moment. StarM 06:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete To be honest, this is borderline A7/G11. Either would have been a perfectly valid speedy. It isn't notable, and it is far from neutral. Mayalld (talk) 08:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The article doesn't say why the club is notable, and I can't find anything on it either. Themfromspace (talk) 08:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete on notability grounds. -- I agree with the nominator that the article implicitly asserts notability, but I don't think it goes on to demonstrate it. I understand why it wasn't speedied.-- S Marshall   Talk / Cont  10:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Based on your comments, I will work on it today to make it more encyclopedic and to add more significance. Thank you. Kehancoc (talk) 13:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I will rewrite spam if i think the organization important enough; the deciding basis on which I thought it not appropriate was that they devote 10% of their revenue to nonprofit cause, and that 10% has so far been in toto: $4,000. This basically is, to quote the article, a book group to support "a new women's section of the bookstore in the small town" of Skaneateles, New York.  DGG (talk) 22:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.