Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Brooks (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Laura Brooks
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Lack of coverage in reliable third-party sources to WP:verify notability, as required by the general notability guideline. Nomination three years ago ended in no consensus, mostly on the good faith belief of the "keep" commenters who believed that there was potential for this article. I've looked into that potential and concluded that further searches WP:WONTWORK and won't turn up more than a single sentence mention here or there (which are not enough to establish notability). The coverage we need doesn't exist, and so this must be deleted. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Uncertain but possible merge to TV series - You have to keep to mind that there may be few significant sources because this is a story character. Google News found several mentions with Patricia Breslin. Considering that I'm not entirely familiar with this TV series, I wouldn't know how significant the character is. SwisterTwister   talk  01:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The reliable source information generally only notes, "She also played Laura Brooks on the prime time soap opera Peyton Place." as part of Patricia Modell's October 2011 obit. After deleting, redirect to Peyton_Place_(TV_series) if needed. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:31, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 02:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete sources barely mention the subject. Not enough to meet the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.