Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Diaz Anadon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Laura Diaz Anadon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person does not meet notability guidelines, and the article is a stub that has undergone a criterion RD1. Dekema2 (talk) 04:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 10:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 10:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of passing any of the WP:PROF criteria, even in the longer and now-redacted copyvio version. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:44, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep while agreeing previous version of article was substandard, but after searching, references were found and added. Her work is cited heavily with 451 citations mostly since 2009. That's roughly 100 citations per year. Plus, being the director of the Belfer Center of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government is an important position. She received prestigious awards -- one presented to her at the House of Commons. QED sharp cookie, active academic, well quoted, important position, meets WP:PROFESSOR, also energy and water tech policy will be increasingly important in coming decades. All considered: publishing, awards, top position, suggests she meets the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. With the exception of CS, I'm not an advocate of GS for the hard sciences (the subject is a ChemE by trade). WoS shows statistics that are very much in line with the "average assistant professor at a top institution": around 150 total citations and h-index 7 with some short quotes of her work in the media/web-o-sphere. I think this is the archetypical WP:TOOSOON. Agricola44 (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.