Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Girling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:20, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Laura Girling

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced BLP; IMDb shows only a handful of roles in TV movies, nothing that would show clear notability. Couldn't find any secondary sources. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:22, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep It was not unreferenced; it included an External link to the IMDB page on Laura Girling.  I converted that to an inline reference, too.  The person is notable enough for an article;  better to keep rather than force re-creation later.  No benefit to deleting, better to allow development. --doncram (talk) 19:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * IMDB does not count as a source worthy of keeping an article; if that was true we'd have a million articles on various actors and second unit directors. If there's anything other than (keywords) imdb, then I'd reconsider, but I found nothing. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 19:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, IMDB is a valid source for some kinds of information. And Girling got 2nd billing in a movie, The Successor (movie) and has had other more signicant parts than a second unit whatever.  So, i think she's significant, and this article should be kept, while u r free to disagree, and obviously do. --doncram (talk) 20:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash;innotata 21:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  —Arxiloxos (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Many (perhaps most) editors consider IMDb reliable for credit information, but not for biographical information, and by itself IMDb is not an indicator of notability, since every person who receives a credit for performing services in a released film has (or should have) an IMDb page.  I can't find any bio articles or other press coverage about her, other than bare mentions of her name in connection with projects.  Unless such coverage turns up, there isn't really a basis to keep the article.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Coverage consist of casting credits which is hardly significant, and as it is mere fact recitation which does not establish notability.  In particular, the appeal to IMDB only verifies her roles for which only one, The Successor seems to be more than a small part.  This single role does not establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Based on a lack sources from Google search, and a lack of other sources already in the article, this article fails WP:NACTOR and therefore does not meet the notability guidelines for people. It also fails the GNG. Pol430  talk to me 18:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.