Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Godoy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  11:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Laura Godoy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. No independent sources to prove notability present in the article. Google hits are mainly related websites or social media. The Banner talk 12:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - I added some sources - some from around the time of the Miss Universe pageant and some from later. There are more, but I think this should do it as far as notability. EricEnfermero  HOWDY! 07:55, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, if you can find me a sport-related source about her volleyball career, I will withdraw the nomination. Because than I am convinced that she is not an one-event-notability person. Unfortunately, up to now I failed to find one. The Banner talk 11:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:33, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - This nominator is making a bad faith, wholesale attempt to remove Miss Universe contestants. Each of them has achieved two events, their National win and their participation in the heavily media covered Miss Universe pageant.  Furthermore, this contestant won Miss Congeniality  All of these Noms should be rejected now and the nominator The Banner should be banned from making such nominations in the future. Trackinfo (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * In fact the bad faith is entirely yours, Trackinfo. I am still convinced that the 73,400 Google hits (that boils down to just 181 unique hits) and the failure to prove her volleyball career, is not enough to prove her notability. The Banner talk 09:50, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * You don't read well do you? Maybe that's your problem.  Where did I mention volleyball?  She is notable for THREE accomplishments, all very sourceable: 1) She won her national pageant, 2) she participated in Miss Universe (and got a lot of coverage just for doing that 3) she WON Miss Congeniality out of all of those contestants.  Your repeated and aggressive defense of your move to delete all of these articles is reprehensible.  Where does 73,400 or even 181 unique seem like a small number of hits?   Each and every one of these contestants got a ton of coverage during the pageant and were on worldwide television.  You are on an aggressive and misguided mission to delete appropriate content from wikipedia and fail to retract from that stance now that you have had time to think.  I do not understand your motives.  You are seriously wasting my time to try to figure out what damage you are trying to do to the wikipedia project. Trackinfo (talk) 10:08, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Could you please stop with your personal attacks? The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 10:20, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Sourcing in article already confirms she meets WP:GNG.--Milowent • <sup style="position:relative">has<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">spoken  15:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.