Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Hudson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. keep arguments rely on assertion rather then actual sources Spartaz Humbug! 09:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Laura Hudson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

An editor-in-chief of a notable magazine, deserves a discussion, not a speedy delete. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  05:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment&mdash;An editor in chief of Comic Foundry Magazine, a small magazine that lasted for five issues. The other information seems of borderline significance. I'm on the fence on this one.&mdash;RJH (talk) 17:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as user above, borderline but weak keep won atleast in my mind.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep as above: Editor-in-chief of a former magazine, now editor-in-chief of ComicsAlliance which seems moderately notable, plus nominated for some award I've never heard of but might be fairly prominent in the industry. I don't think the continued existence of this article does Wikipedia any harm, but it really needs better sourcing. bobrayner (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Sources cited so far do not satisfy WP:BIO. Someone is not notable per Wikipedia standards just for editing some specialized hobbyist magazine. Edison (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BIO, WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, etc.  Qworty (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.