Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Ingraham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:FOOLS (non-admin closure) L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  01:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Laura Ingraham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. She's going to get fired eventually. Acnetj (talk) 03:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 April 1.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Snow close Clearly notable as seen from even a casual search on Google News. Also, reason given for AfD doesn't make sense -- being fired would not make a notable person not notable.  LK (talk) 04:06, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * See WP:FOOLS ansh 666 04:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 because I don't like her. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 08:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Knows some of the Wae. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  18:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.