Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Lee (adult model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @505  · 11:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Laura Lee (adult model)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

utterly non-notable. zero signs of significance, generic glamour model with generic pseudonym. Not even a Penthouse Pet, just a "feature" model. Virtually all "references" go to advertising pages for erotica sites failing WP:RS, often not mentioning article subject's name. My original prod removed without explanation by IP anon which has no other edit history. Article now being subjected to repeated spam insertions, completely unsourced, by user self-identifying as article subject and by affiliated SPAs. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom unless better sourcing shows up to prove notability.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Close to Speedy Delete, per nom and the unlikelihood of decent refs turning up. PhGustaf (talk) 23:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - In this case, I (Laura Lee) as the subject feel all my references meet the general criteria: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject is published] the references to the websites are specified to the exact location to see information or subject, NOT SPAM. My personal website includes all the information under Resume area.  I beleive as the subject, anyone reading there own bio would like the information to be true and most accurate for those interested as to whom the person/subject is.
 * Comment to Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, I believe that in my industry, we would like to be credited for what we did and how we got there and I dont feel that "facts quoted by the subject" should be an automatic disqualifier. Additionally, I would also like to include information regarding the article published by Palm Springs Life, it's a magazine (not a spa) therefore I referenced the online interview with myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miss Laura Lee (talk • contribs)
 * Comment. Hullaballo's reference to "SPAs" was not to actual spas. The acronym SPA is used on Wikipedia to denote a single-purpose account. Deor (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. As it stands currently, the only verifiable information about her is that she's had breast augmentation surgery by a particular doctor who was the subject of an article in a local website. Other than that refs of course are to the tour pages of paysites. Gsearch isn't helpful either. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability found and an interview with a small magazine about her boobs doesn't get her there. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO as is, and I'm not going looking for more sources. Jclemens (talk) 17:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * delete Apparently doesn't meet WP:N,WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. JoshuaZ (talk) 21:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * delete as not notable per nominator and previous editors. Sarah 14:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * delete clearly per nom--BozMo talk 10:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.