Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Liswood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Laura Liswood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this, this, this, this and this but none of these links show convincingly better improvement. Pinging past users, and  and also  who may be interested to comment. SwisterTwister  talk  06:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Longtime chief permanent officer of a major international organization. The rest of the material is a little vague, but she's also notable as an author ,which the article fails to emphasise: Women world leaders : fifteen great politicians tell their stories from a major feminist publisher is in 485 libraries, and two other important books. .  DGG ( talk ) 10:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: per DGG, but also restructure article so it's more like an encyclopedia article and less like the personal web page from which a lot of it was copied in early edits (eg do away with "Experience" section). Pam  D  21:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep but strip down as per PamD. Stifle (talk) 10:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.