Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Rose Chapman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 03:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Laura Rose Chapman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research by an apparent single-purpose account holder and self-described "fan". A basic Google search reveals no reliable sources from which to confirm the notability of the subject. Scjessey (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete either a hoax or extreme aggrandisement of a non-notable person. I strongly doubt that an internationally-known popstar on the cusp of a world tour wuld get just 10 google hits, all of them facebook buddies. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Theirs must be the only school studying the 'Sun and Rain' song (see Talk Page). May be heading for stardom. Not there yet. Peridon (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any sourcing - reliable or otherwise - using Google, , - baring this in mind I find it very unlikely that the main claims of notability (100,000 records sold, multiple tv appearances) are true. With no sources no verifiable article can be written. Guest9999 (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds clearly like a hoax to me with all those 100,000 — unless we assume that the 100,000 refer to atoms of something, like a lemonade stand, in which case I've sold lots more than 100,000 myself. Nyttend (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 04:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.