Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Safran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 07:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Laura Safran

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Minimally sourced article, written far more like a résumé than an encyclopedia article, of a lawyer with no particularly strong claim to passing WP:LAWYERS. The referencing here is based entirely on primary sources rather than reliable source coverage in media, so she has no strong claim to passing WP:GNG either. Bearcat (talk) 03:00, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable lawyer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as an advertising for an unconvincing lawyer whose attention and news would only come from any known clients and affiliates, therefore as the article shows these concerns quite noticeably, there's nothing suggesting otherwise. SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No secondary source coverage about her. Everything is press releases or otherwise non-independent sources. agt x  15:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.