Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Vuitton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Laura Vuitton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability, posted by the author or her publishers, no refs beyond ISBN Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Book is self-published on Lulu. Not a shred of notability found.  -- Finngall   talk  06:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:COI WP:SPA article on a self-published book, sourced only to itself. My searches find nothing that could meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Books-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  15:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Puff piece for a self-published book. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm tempted to close this per SNOW, but for now I'll just add this little flake. Drmies (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as not all yet independently notable. SwisterTwister   talk  23:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: No coverage, self-published. Esquivalience  t 01:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.