Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura warwick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Laura warwick

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable self-published singer, fails WP:MUSIC, WP:V. The only working sourced referenced is her own website, and the paltry 83 hits on UK Google are all Wiki mirrors, Facebook, the personal website and blogs; nary a reliable source to be found.  RGTraynor  20:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No valid assertation of notability, no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't pass WP:MUSIC, yet. (Also, Geogre's Law.) AndyJones (talk) 12:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep? 600 Google results for "laura warwick" "no more" - various independent media discussing the single and The Public Record Label. Don't know if it's a little early for her to have a Wikipedia page though...shooutoout (talk) 14:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: As it happens, most of the results when trying "Laura Warwick" + "no more" on the UK Google turn out to refer to a character in a stage play. To quote from WP:V: "Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy  ... In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; usually followed by university-level textbooks; then by magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; then by mainstream newspapers."  The "independent media" - largely comprised of bloggers - don't have a sterling reputation for fact-checking or accuracy.    RGTraynor  14:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.