Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurance Rudic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. –  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 23:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Laurance Rudic
the page is full of irrelevancies Cairoguy 19:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC) Obvious keep, frivolous nomination. Monicasdude 19:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * No Vote. I'm confused. You're the original contributor and, as far as I can tell, except for the tags, it's the same as what you originally created. Why is it now irrelevant? -- JLaTondre 01:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep, on imdb, -- Astrokey44 |talk 05:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep notable actor. Camillus (talk) 13:27, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but it smells like a copyvio (although I couldn't find anything). Peyna 14:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd agree the page is full of irrelevancies, but that is a better argument for cleanup than for deletion. I've taked a first crack (and by no means the last that needs to be done) at editing by fixing punctuation and trying to cut the article down a bit.  I think it would benefit immensely from someone with better knowlege of the subject matter than I taking all his rolls, theatre companies, and stage productions and puting them in a table.  As it stands though they guy seems notable enough in theatre circles to justify the article.  It just needs to be cleaned up.--Isotope23 18:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.