Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel and Hardy: Style of comedy and characterizations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Laurel and Hardy. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Laurel and Hardy: Style of comedy and characterizations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:SYNTHESIS, WP:OR. It's as if someone has written an essay for school. Any salvageable material can be incorporated at the main article at Laurel and Hardy, if not already. -- Rob Sinden (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


 * delete Looks like a term paper for a filmography class. Mangoe (talk) 17:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Laurel and Hardy, rather as the nominator suggests. This article was split off from the main one in November 2009 and the topic has since been developed in both places. Since this article has scarcely a reference but contains nothing objectionable in its contents, I suggest redirecting back to the original but leaving the text in the history behind the redirect. Then any enthusiast can rejig things, hopefully with references. However, the present material is too much like an essay to attempt a formal merge.Thincat (talk) 21:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Thincat. Separate article not warranted as per nom.  Gong   show  19:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.