Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurelvale Cricket Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of cricket clubs in Ireland. v/r - TP 16:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Laurelvale Cricket Club

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This club falls into exactly the same category as those discussed at here,here,here, here,here,here, here, here, here, here and here. It plays at third teir of a provincial league in Ireland, the article lacks sources to pass WP:GNG. Mt king  (edits)  03:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  — Mt  king  (edits)  03:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. A second secondary source has been added to the article. Mooretwin (talk) 09:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - yes, a secondary source that is self-published, without an apparently valid ISBN, no record at WorldCat and minimal hits at Google (209 GHits, including sellers, no GBooks hit at all, no GScholar), Even the reviews at ulstercricketer.com share the domain name used by the author for enquiries about purchase. I know that Google is not everything, but is this good enough? - Sitush (talk) 10:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Been thinking about this. Whilst I am well aware of AGF, a lot of books of this type contain tables etc and I am concerned that this may be just a passing mention (just because the club is listed in a book would not in itself indicate notability, and a single page mention does not seem like much). Could you possibly either mail me a scan of the relevant bit or transcribe onto the article talk page? Use a throwaway email account if you want. It would be so much easier if these clubs had actually won the Senior Cup or the top tier of the league at some point (as indeed one did, the AfD of which I opposed recently for that reason). - Sitush (talk) 11:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to respond to the insulting comment immediately above, clearly in breach of AGF. (You seem to have plenty of time on your hands: order the book from the library if you don't believe the reference to be genuine.) But just to refute the first allegation, the ISBN is 0-9545892-0-3. Mooretwin (talk) 00:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I have no issue with the existence of the ref, just that is appears unlikely to address the subject [club] in significant detail so even with it it sill fails WP:GNG and WP:CLUB, like all the others listed in the nomination, existence does not equal notability. Mt  king  (edits)  01:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete - as per nom - No notability.  Velella  Velella Talk 10:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of cricket clubs in Ireland, doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:CLUB.--Pontificalibus (talk) 11:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:07, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.