Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurelwood Pub and Brewery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Additional sources were brought forth after nomination. The lone "delete" !vote asserts that one of the sources does not help meet notability requirements, but does not discuss the relevance of any of the other sources. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Laurelwood Pub and Brewery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Absolutely no meaningful coverage outside of a few sentences in a handful of hyper local sources. Fails GNG and I guess technically NCORP? Praxidicae (talk) 15:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment While this is obviously a travel guide entry at the moment, the company is actually known for 1) early pursuit of the "certified organic" market in beer, 2) high-profile location(s) in the Portland airport. Searching for "Laurelwood Brewing" in Google Books finds multi-page profiles and (probably PR text), from which the article could be expanded. As expected, there are also lots of bits here and there about its airport locations, including brief mentions in Vogue and The Economist. Bakazaka (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep There are several news searches, try a search with "laurelwood brewery oregon". I've added a couple of sources. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  17:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject evidently passes WP:GNG and so should be kept for improvement per WP:IMPERFECT; WP:ATD; WP:NOTCLEANUP; &c. Andrew D. (talk) 23:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete It's a trivial mention in an article about another business that took over their old physical location. "the same space previously occupied by Laurelwood Brewing. Laurelwood still has a small pub in the A Concourse.". That's a trivial of trivial coverage. Graywalls (talk) 17:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per sourcing referenced by others above. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 07:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep The format of the sources is poor (raw links) and the coverage is sparse at best, but given that the sources do discuss this location in some depth, and given that they appear to be independent of the restaurant, this seems worth retaining. A loose necktie (talk) 08:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.