Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Duca


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Lauren Duca

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP1E, Person known only for one event. Duca is known for one event, and subsequent minor current events. The article reads as a news source/promotion for Duca's material rather than an encyclopedic entry. HellHasNoFurries (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Lauren Duca
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 16.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 00:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. ETA: criteria #2 particularly after politics comment on talk. One could also make a WP:SNOW keep argument, as reliable source coverage of multiple events over time is so abundant (adding SK criteria #3 to the mix as well?) that deletion would be completely outside of current AfD norms, and editor time should not be wasted reviewing the case needlessly. But trying to prevent at least some of that is why SK exists, so I'll leave my ivote for reasons mentioned. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Kiernanmc (talk) 05:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep She is not a low-profile person, so WP:BLP1E does not apply. I don't think WP:BIO1E is an issue here either. There is significant coverage of her, and not just for one event. Meters (talk) 06:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep She's an award-winning journalist. Keep as per . Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy & Snow Keep: AfD created by a single purpose new account.--Milowent • hasspoken  17:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.