Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Elaine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 11:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Lauren Elaine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable person, article created by a PR agency (and dePRODed by a sockpuppet). Brief, routine coverage in one reliable source and only slightly more in-depth coverage in a possibly unreliable source don't pass WP:BIO. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 19:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

ATTN: I am a third party, not the PR Agency list above. I have fixed the referencing problems for this article, as well as cited proper newsworthy articles as found online, relating to the subject, from verifiable sources, including Women's Wear Daily and CA Apparel News- not cited/mentioned by the PR Agency above. I will continue to add/correct referencing problems, as I find them. I am a knowledgeable "fashion fan", and advocate of this page, as a member of the Los Angeles fashion community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FashionFanCA (talk • contribs) 21:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC) — FashionFanCA (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Weak Delete. Cleaned up article is better. I still slightly struggle to see how it passes WP:BIO, but I know we are usually very forgiving in relation to articles on photogenic Fashion Designer/Actress/Models, so I won't protest violently if a decision is taken to keep. --Legis (talk - contribs) 00:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep meets WP:BIO with sufficient coverage in 3rd party sources particularly Womens Wear Daily and other trade publications. RadioFan (talk) 02:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep satisfies GNG requirements. Cavarrone (talk) 08:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep A developing name in the fashion world. Satisfies notability requirements. SteveStrummer (talk) 21:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Several sources are given to establish notability. Meets WP:BIO criteria. Tinton5 (talk) 02:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.