Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Nadada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Lauren Nadada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Actress I'm trying to find anything for. She apparently has only one role (for a short film that does not even have a Wikipedia page) and nothing else. I can't find anything for her (not even a IMDB page at the very least, which shows for something), all I can find are wiki mirrors. Wgolf (talk) 23:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  02:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  02:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  02:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as am not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources or even unreliable sources. If good sources, perhaps in Persian, are found please ping me Atlantic306 (talk) 18:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete one significant role is not enough to make an actress notable, especially in a case like this where it is not clear the film itself is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - The person appears to be made up, or at least the information in the article is made up. Read through the single provided source.  It is somebody's blog where they are posting a story in three parts.  "In Deep" isn't a real film.  It's a film in that story.  A work of ficiton. -- Whpq (talk) 00:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment-I am wondering if this is a hoax article as well and if we should submit this into the longest hoaxes on Wikipedia. Wgolf (talk) 23:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Another comment-looks like the archive bot did restore the dead link, but it's still a dead link. Wgolf (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.