Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Ricks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Let's WP:SNOW such hoaxes, please. Fram 13:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Lauren Ricks

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This seems very much like a hoax. Article borders on ridiculous; cursory Googles turned up nothing. Oh, and a PROD was removed, so I brought it here.Iknowyourider (t c) 20:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails criteria in WP:BIO and WP:RS.--Edtropolis 20:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * "All sources were lost in a 2005 fire"... must've burned the references to that Us Weekly title and all the other stuff, too. Google says "what?" Editor says delete as completely unverified and probably (he said, in an understated manner) a hoax. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as patent (but stylish) nonsense. Clarityfiend 21:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a badly-written article that fails WP:BIO. — Wenli 02:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.