Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren V. Wood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   00:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Lauren V. Wood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. She is one of many who, according to the article, is known for studies of vaccines. This alone is not enough for an article. rayukk &#124; talk 16:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  18:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, is widely published and respected in her field relating to new ways of treating cancer and HIV through vaccinations. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PROF. Five publications with over 100 citations each (on Google scholar) should be enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. No valid rationale for deletion. "He is one of many who, according to the article, is known for playing for the Dallas Cowboys. This alone is not enough for an article" would result in a speedy keep. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Well, she doesn't play for the Dallas Cowboys, but other than that, yeah. -rayukk &#124; talk 23:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep For all the reasons stated by others. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Well-sourced and satisfies WP:GNG, as well as WP:PROF. clpo13(talk) 23:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: passes WP:PROF as David Eppstein notes. Edwardx (talk) 23:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.