Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren mckinney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  SilkTork  *YES! 16:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Lauren mckinney

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The prod was contested. She fails WP:ENT because she has only one role. Joe Chill (talk) 00:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, probably could have been speedied. Fails WP:ENT and probably violates WP:COI. Article creator's only other edit is a removal of Joe Chill's deletion notice, which to me indicates an obvious bad faith actor. Şłџğģő  00:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It couldn't have been speedied because having a major role in a film is a claim to notability. Joe Chill (talk) 00:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess, but given the film's notability (that is, none), it still ought to go. Şłџğģő  01:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The film is notable. Joe Chill (talk) 01:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Per my link, no it's not, but whatever.  Şłџğģő  09:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No news coverage or roles since that I could find. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Single significant role, no significant coverage.  Jujutacular  T · C 05:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —  Jujutacular  T · C 05:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, would have been a valid A7, but I'll echo everything said above here. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete per everyone. Just plain not notable enough. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO: WP:ENT Mkdw talk 23:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: few reliable sources covering her; most are gossip sites.  —EncMstr (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing to add. Perhaps not speediable, but a clear delete case. tedder (talk) 23:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A1. No context. and A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content) if possible. Otherwise, delete as NN, lacking RS, V, etc.  Relatively few reviews appear to address her performance.  Of those that do, ABC Online's At the Movies, for example notes that in the "young inexperienced" cast, her performance stands out as "disappointing." Ouch.  Creator would have done better to spare her from this AfD by not contesting the prod. Шизомби (SZ) (talk) 18:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article isn't a slam dunk speedy, as there are a lot of sources.  The challenge is finding reliable sources.  —EncMstr (talk) 21:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not quite so many sources as that . But indeed, how many are RS, i.e. more than trivial is an open question, though the apparent answer is none. Шизомби (SZ) (talk) 22:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete without prejudice toward recreation if someone wishes to actually write more than one sentence. The actress seems to have only one major role in the film Paranoid Park (film), for which she gets mention in lots of places... but nothing in depth. The single role fails WP:ENT and the apparent lack of significant coverage fails WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Perhaps notable one day, but not currently.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  22:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ENT. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.