Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurence Clancy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.    Sandstein   19:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Laurence Clancy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Totally unsouurced biography for person of doubtful notability, whose only Google appearance appears to be this article RolandR (talk) 12:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not indicate notability. -- Jeandré, 2008-05-11t14:26z
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. GoogleScholar returns zero hits. After searching WoS for quite a while I did find several citations of his work (about 14 total). No evidence of high citability or of satisfying WP:PROF on any other grounds. Nsk92 (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete NN wondered the 1st time I saw this may also be a WP:COI as the creator User:Dolphin51 seems to be the subject. --Nate1481(t/c) 10:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Please retain. I created the article on Laurence Clancy for one reason.  I have cited his book Aerodynamics many, many times.  I contribute to Wikipedia in the area of aerodynamics, fluid mechanics and aviation.  Clancy's book is brilliantly clear and well-written.  It is my source and inspiration for most of my work.  Readers of Wikipedia are entitled to ask "Who is this L.J. Clancy?  Does he or she have credibility on this subject?"  I created the biographical article as a stub to provide a little information about this author, and in the hope that others would expand the stub.  I am a resident of Australia, a long way from Bradford University and Cranfield where Clancy worked so I am reliant on others to provide some up-to-date information.


 * In the field of aerodynamics and fluid mechanics there are other cited authors who have a biographical article to shed some light on their background and therefore their credentials. For example, see the WP articles on the following authors, all of whom are cited in articles such as Hydrodynamics:


 * George Batchelor


 * John D. Anderson


 * Horace Lamb


 * Lev Landau


 * Evgeny Lifshitz


 * When I cite Clancy, or write about him, there is no conflict of interest. Dolphin51 (talk) 13:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but are you seriously comparing Clancy to George Batchelor? The latter produces impressive GoogleScholar results, with his book "The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence" scoring 1533 cites and the other book "An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics" scoring 488 cites. By cpmparison, Clancy's book does not even register in GoogleScholar, nor does anything else by him.
 * In any event, general WP:ILIKEIT, WP:USEFUL and WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments are insufficient; you need to produce positive and verifiable evidence of notability. It might be that Clancy's "Aerodynamics" book is notable and that for some reason GoogleScholar and Web of Science are missing a large number of citations. If it can be shown that the book is notable per WP:BK then it is better to have a WP article about the book rather than the person. It would be easier to satisfy the notability requirements there. Even then, you would have to do some serious preparatory work before creating an article about the book. Look for sources that cite it, reviews of the book, evidence that it was used for courses, etc. Since you are an expert in the field, it should be easier for you to do this than for other people. In the meantime, I suggest that you look up the existing notability guidelines such as WP:BIO, WP:PROF, WP:N, WP:BK etc. Nsk92 (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I am not even talking about your comparison of Clancy with Lev Landau, a Nobel Prize winner and a scientific giant. Preposterous, don't you think? Nsk92 (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Nsk92! I have not compared Clancy with anybody; not Batchelor, not Landau, nor anyone else. You are the one who has introduced the concept of comparison of one person with another. If you carefully read my words on this page you will see I wrote only that certain articles (eg Hydrodynamics) cite certain authors and provide links to biographical articles about those authors. (eg Batchelor et al). My words are statements of fact. Thank you for the links to WP articles. I will study them. Dolphin51 (talk) 23:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * delete per Nsk92, no evidence of notable impact as a academic, or otherwise. Pete.Hurd (talk) 18:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clancy is the author of Aerodynamics.  This is a 587-page textbook in the field of Aeronautical Engineering.  It is one of the Pitman Aeronautical Engineering Series.


 * Aerodynamics was published in the United Kingdom. Its content reflects over seven years of teaching aerodynamics to students at the Royal Air Force College, Cranwell UK.  It was widely used as a textbook in the UK, Australia and other British Commonwealth countries.  It was also published in the USA by John Wiley and Sons, Inc.


 * Clancy qualifies as a notable academic using Criterion No. 3 given here. He also matches Example No. 1 given here.   Dolphin51 (talk) 03:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The fact that the book was intended to be used as a textbook does not imply that it has been widely used as a textbook. If you provide actual evidence of the latter, that would be convincing in terms of satisfying WP:PROF.Nsk92 (talk) 11:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)