Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurent Schwartz (oncologist) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —  Za  wl  16:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Laurent Schwartz (oncologist)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable corporate executive, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. No demonstrated notability as an executive or scientist. Created by the same DUCK paid editor who created this promotional article on Schwartz's company Biorebus, and our tolerance of such articles has waned since this article was last subject to an AfD in 2013. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 11:27, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is the second time that the nominator has taken this BLP to AfD. It was kept. Notability, if anything, has increased since then. Keep for same reasons as before. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC).
 * Keep. I'm as allergic to corporate promotionalism as anyone—although this scientist's foray into the private sector was apparently motivated by the decidedly un-selfish goal of curing cancer—but I agree that there has been no substantial change since the last AfD. The subject's citation record demonstrated notability in 2013 (WP:PROF), and it still does so now. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.