Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Pawlitza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Laurie Pawlitza

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

previously successfully PROD'd and recreated. The subject does not pass WP:GNG. Graywalls (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. There are some hits in trade publications (e.g.,, ) and she seems like a recognized authority in adoption law (see ), but I don't think I see enough coverage for WP:BASIC. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * comment I mean. . . I would assume most lawyers are "recognized authority" in at least something within their practice expertise, but that's different from notable. When they're running "problem solver" type shows on TV, journalist call up professionals in the relevant field all the time, and many gladly oblige without compensation for publicity. Graywalls (talk) 12:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete If it was only trade journals. However, there is a lot of passing mentions, in the context of her profession. There is no real coverage that would satisfy WP:SIRS, WP:SIGCOV. For examples she is mentioned in many papers as Laurie Pawlitza, a lawyer for three of the lesbian couple, said Laurie Pawlitza, family lawyer, Laurie Pawlitza, partner at Torkin Manes LLP in Toronto and on and on. Fails WP:BIO.    scope_creep Talk  09:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.