Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Lavish

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:MUSBIO and WP:GNG. Has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works. Hack (talk) 15:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete, insufficient reliable sources found that cover the subject in a manor sufficient to pass significant coverage as defined by WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 01:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 20.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  05:45, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - Although he has released albums including a recent free EP, he has not received any substantial attention and the references listed aren't substantial either. Despite multiple Google News searches, I found nothing to improve this article aside from short blogs. I'm voting delete with absolutely zero prejudice towards a future article. SwisterTwister   talk  02:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.