Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law & Kenneth Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Law & Kenneth Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of importance and significance. Itsalleasy (talk) 03:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  hmssolent lambast patrol records 04:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  hmssolent lambast patrol records 04:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I am doubtful of the firm's notability, for want of reliable sources, but also due to the word salad in the article. Bearian (talk) 19:18, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete A firm like many others in the world but not notable.User:Lucifero4
 * Delete Nothing special. Pointless wiki for a company that has no notable achievements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.45.209 (talk) 03:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.