Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law Asia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Law Asia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. References are passing mentions, one blog and quotes from the founder. There does not seem to be any third party commentary about the organization. J bh Talk  19:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  19:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  19:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  19:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  19:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is just another law firm here. Nothing shows that it is notable - they have not received any significant independent coverage to fulfil WP:CORPDEPTH. For comparison, we do have notable law firms in Singapore (such as Rajah & Tann Asia) and they usually receive a lot of coverage. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.